From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 23 07:47:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1EBC1065672 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 07:47:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hoomanfazaeli@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B918FC1B for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 07:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbon10 with SMTP id n10so5548481lbo.13 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 00:47:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MqR2NgMRyjuZt2gORhvebUYpezmHoMlKR0LZKI/kHC4=; b=nZ3P9lwQ4BKxNdo73+S2YzAf6Ih4mKCapG9k1bQm+gI4DS+DnW6yrONCUp5bztMFrg XUd/nUIAeMromPy4feTcikIH6qKX7hVIlioZgqcbdDh1HE31AN36HZUZYIAGqM1Ef9UQ Q3PRumSShlGwJFPjBWjU7/Khp8nBqIUs9qARPxLvutw/LXcqVN0kYInsrAg6g6bXJIZi CJFpRcrG5Q5E96/BfHwPhe5VetF75Z+ON+53Kw4Q3JkvZnaRZDPBmUf3Tfjp8C7UR7Og 5LCMHXwoPIsSe3TEcKHdMc8XYlglo8NqNtoMTDr/CXCa+NuXVQ4wGBGoXchIA9/JyZwd eoRA== Received: by 10.112.49.227 with SMTP id x3mr2658993lbn.73.1340437644019; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 00:47:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([84.241.57.181]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n7sm1134850lbk.10.2012.06.23.00.47.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 23 Jun 2012 00:47:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FE57481.90601@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 12:17:13 +0430 From: Hooman Fazaeli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar References: <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com> <4FE32C16.3050205@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 07:47:25 -0000 I meant, is it now possible to have >2TB FS with UFS? On 6/21/2012 6:54 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Hooman Fazaeli wrote: > >> On 6/21/2012 4:22 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> stick with UFS. It JUST WORKS(R), and is trusty. >>> And it works fast. >>> >> What options are there for >2TB file systems with UFS? >> > the same as for <2TB filesystems. >