From owner-soc-status@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 7 11:16:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: soc-status@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1A31065673 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 11:16:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gockzy@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D828FC15 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 11:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyg7 with SMTP id 7so352562eyg.13 for ; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 04:16:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=etzCpIN/q0t9SLhPFp6dg5wHgOsSmuBQc6pMKZbEJlQ=; b=XrRt1O6l709OS8MjWWDMwVaFPaIinP0pSoC5/PzfBGxFGAjYg0fBHerWNOZVQPt55I dF/F6ytgwavxpZ4jFBtZCpVD67Eseio3Ztw6M+WeKtMi9hclQcBKS4F0GsOOTZiW/J7Q F8CZyBnq0N9eGmOnZTfh38ZKFfTqudHbkvpwg= Received: by 10.213.13.14 with SMTP id z14mr251851ebz.30.1310034411121; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 03:26:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.113.212 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 03:26:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Kazuya Goda Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 19:26:31 +0900 Message-ID: To: soc-status@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [status report] RPS/RFS #week6 X-BeenThere: soc-status@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Summer of Code Status Reports and Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 11:16:05 -0000 Hi, The project goal is to implement RPS/RFS on FreeBSD. RPS solves the problem of mono-queue NIC which can't distribute packets across multiple processors. RFS is the extension of RPS, which deliver packets to the CPU where application running. This week status: * Implements RFS I implemented RFS, but it is only working when sysctrl parameter is configured belows: - net.isr.threadnum:[number of CPUs] - net.isr.bindthreads:[1] It is necessary to net.isr.threadnum is flexible. next wee: * Enable changing net.isr.threadnum --Kazuya Goda