Date: 16 Jul 2000 21:53:53 +0200 From: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre%no-spam@citeweb.net> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: nsayer@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysctl interface for apm? Message-ID: <lmz1zwa6.fsf@pc166.gits.fr> In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp's message of "Sun, 16 Jul 2000 10:55:03 %2B0200" References: <1884.963737703@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> writes: > In message <200007160625.XAA92886@freefall.freebsd.org>, nsayer@FreeBSD.ORG wri > tes: > > >So what does everyone think? Is it suitable to add a read only > >sysctl 'machdep.apm_powerstate' that reports either AC, nn%, > >or N/A ? Or should the format be numeric (999 = AC, <=100 = battery %, > >-1 = N/A)? Or should we not bother? :-) > > yes it is suitable. isn't it the job of one of the apm options ? such as apm -l ? Cyrille. -- home:mailto:clefevre%no-spam@citeweb.net Supprimer "%no-spam" pour me repondre. work:mailto:Cyrille.Lefevre%no-spam@edf.fr Remove "%no-spam" to answer me back. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?lmz1zwa6.fsf>