Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 18:09:11 +0800 From: "Tz-Huan Huang" <tzhuan@csie.org> To: "Pawel Jakub Dawidek" <pjd@freebsd.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there any way to increase the KVM? Message-ID: <6a7033710806050309l7b994e96i6e4f2f6383444ab0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080605062728.GA4278@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <6a7033710805302252v43a7b240x66ca3f5e3dd5fda4@mail.gmail.com> <20080603135308.GC3434@garage.freebsd.pl> <6a7033710806032317g4dbe8845h26a1196016b9c440@mail.gmail.com> <86zlq140x0.fsf@ds4.des.no> <6a7033710806041053g4a5c2fdftd7202b708bff363c@mail.gmail.com> <20080605062728.GA4278@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 01:53:37AM +0800, Tz-Huan Huang wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no> wrote: > I'm don't think the panics are related to pool size. More to the load > and characteristics of your workload. I see. Our server exports all zfs filesytem via nfs to other 10 machines, which run the svm (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Support_vector_machine) day and night to classify the video data ... > If we're comparing who has bigger... :) > > beast:root:~# zpool list > NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT > tank 732G 604G 128G 82% ONLINE - > > but: > > beast:root:~# zfs list | wc -l > 1932 > > No panics. > > PS. I'm quite sure the ZFS version I've in perforce will fix most if not > all 'kmem_map too small' panics. It's not yet committed, but I do want > to MFC it into RELENG_7. That's great news! Thanks, Tz-Huan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6a7033710806050309l7b994e96i6e4f2f6383444ab0>