From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 11 08:48:24 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from apollo.emma.line.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5563106566B
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 08:48:24 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mandree@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1C423DB20
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:48:23 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4DCA4D57.8090501@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 10:48:23 +0200
From: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
References: <20110511032440.GA85517@DataIX.net>
In-Reply-To: <20110511032440.GA85517@DataIX.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: graphics/netpbm upgrade from _2 -> _3
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 08:48:25 -0000

Am 11.05.2011 05:24, schrieb Jason Hellenthal:
> 
> Is the the check for a already install same version really neccesary any 
> more ?
> 
> When upgrading from _2 to _3 it currently bails.
> 
> Attached is the patch that corrects that behavior.
> 

Jason,

there may still be people who upgrade less frequently and are still
using a 10.2* version.

However, because this was too painful (particularly as portmaster can't
chop out a failing dependency subtree and continue with the working
ports), I've spent some time yesterday to analyze the problem and
proposed a patch to address this problem, and to address the parallel
build: <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=156930>

Dirk (dinoex@) has committed a more efficient alternative, so even users
who have some old 10.2?.* version installed can now build 10.35.80_3
without deinstalling the old version first.
(We haven't bumped the PORTREVISION as the installed files do not change.)


There is also a patch pending that re-enables MAKE_JOBS_SAFE for the
benefit of those with multi-core computers (like I am).

Best regards
Matthias