From owner-cvs-all  Fri Jul  5 22: 0:24 2002
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4D95637B400; Fri,  5 Jul 2002 22:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 58D1143E09; Fri,  5 Jul 2002 22:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8])
          by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
          id <20020706050014.UTBH15755.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>;
          Sat, 6 Jul 2002 05:00:14 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA16541;
	Fri, 5 Jul 2002 21:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 21:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: David Xu <bsddiy@yahoo.com>
Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_synch.c
In-Reply-To: <20020706032222.91526.qmail@web20908.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207052058590.16316-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

the checkin I just made is a stopgap.. I'm thinking about rewriting 
some of the code there.

On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, David Xu wrote:
> > with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
> 
> do we needn't check p->p_sigacts->ps_sigintr?
> this change prevents this checking.
> I would rather set rval = 0 but not ERESTART,
> so ps_sigintr can be checked before return.



It's possible that we should also check ps_sigintr
in the first cursig() too, but I
am not sure it is needed for thread_suspend_check().

The behaviour of threaded processes in the face of
signals has not been fully defined yet.


> 
> -David Xu
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message