From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 8 17:18:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA14594 for current-outgoing; Tue, 8 Apr 1997 17:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from austin.polstra.com (austin.polstra.com [206.213.73.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA14586 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 1997 17:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from austin.polstra.com (jdp@localhost) by austin.polstra.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA09538; Tue, 8 Apr 1997 17:18:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199704090018.RAA09538@austin.polstra.com> To: Michael Smith cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfs problem In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 09 Apr 1997 09:24:53 +0930." <199704082354.JAA21446@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> References: <199704082354.JAA21446@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Date: Tue, 08 Apr 1997 17:18:36 -0700 From: John Polstra Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I find it extremely annoying that named options line "resvport" > aren't documented for mount or mount_nfs. *grumble* "resvport" is documented in mount_nfs(8), under the "-o" option. It and the other named options are described as deprecated, though. > sysctl -w vfs.nfs.nfs_privport=0 Thanks. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Self-knowledge is always bad news." -- John Barth