From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 31 23:16:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CBA106566B; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:16:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacombar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8788FC0C; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyh11 with SMTP id 11so2677473wyh.13 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:16:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CMhyiDnh1JpxlNqSWoEYuFbFnqcUTOnwCPbfF7DFGQo=; b=DHBlW0wPUu/nqeqMFct0NOBnAGWP8vAHyt8cwHGnajoXdDsVA+5Pk92sSIegbZWfZj wPcBk3vJSbL8j1tcnPv6UoKpxaNVqHp0i3p6Ek5+b6BS2gMa0zk/nRPwj5G63ial4LPV sUrDm4Lgv9Y20p8DWF+O7qrF3MkOsLLI2ul1Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.209.21 with SMTP id ge21mr21054686wbb.6.1320102981624; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:16:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.105.162 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:16:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:16:21 -0400 Message-ID: From: Arnaud Lacombe To: Julian Elischer , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Undocumented netgraph `cmd' flags ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:16:23 -0000 Hi Julian, For my information, is it documented anywhere that bit 28[0] and 29[1] of Netgraph message's `cmd' shall not be used (the bits, not the macros) ? Thanks, - Arnaud [0]: NGM_READONLY [1]: NGM_HASREPLY