From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 6 02:07:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD8F3C8 for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 02:07:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dt71@gmx.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE741EA4 for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 02:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.80] ([31.46.168.110]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MYKGj-1UxFdP14Yj-00V9VQ for ; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 04:07:26 +0200 Message-ID: <51AFEECF.3000408@gmx.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 04:07:11 +0200 From: dt71@gmx.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "injunction" on the use of GA References: <51AF2DE4.3090103@gmx.com> <201306051034.20000.jhb@freebsd.org> <51AF7E72.8010108@gmx.com> <20130606001815.GA57415@whisperer.chthonixia.net> In-Reply-To: <20130606001815.GA57415@whisperer.chthonixia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:qynNLvhNc70bo7IzYWCzHSZlcKGhs9NqLTX0iDWs9e4WDJ6zK4h ruz0o+DHTluONSWpIjH3OMkJMIQFBizMqC7pfByTbn4Ifxb31GK9XphUR/qEVM//LCxqIcD p+Jnk3ZLigN9FnSbG+ROQM5Jl+vH4cy9KuR8eLIsPObiPxcwcOxVyaiRoApONQHlazCzknl 0X835gSFzb8+dBydssV9Q== X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 02:07:27 -0000 On 06/06/2013 02:18, Joe Altman wrote: > you are what you claim others are. Which is? > And FWIW, it's not the community that, AFAICT, arguing against GA. It's > a few people in that community who, apparently, don't wish to use any > sort of localhost mechanism to adress the issue. Again, FWIW: I would > prefer the FBSD project did not use GA; but it does and for good > reasons. Weblog analysis is hard. Google, with its analytics, does it > well. The project needs that analysis. May I ask all commenters to first read the discussions, so that they actually understand what the problem is and whether the web site needs GA?