From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 7 15:01:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81FDF106568F; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:01:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AFF08FC15; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (adsl-154-218-170.ard.bellsouth.net [72.154.218.170]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nB7F1EEv092038 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:01:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) From: Robert Noland To: Norikatsu Shigemura In-Reply-To: <20091206234629.439da260.nork@FreeBSD.org> References: <20091205104243.f66171bb.nork@FreeBSD.org> <1260107482.2315.252.camel@balrog.2hip.net> <20091206234629.439da260.nork@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: FreeBSD Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:01:09 -0600 Message-Id: <1260198069.2315.261.camel@balrog.2hip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RDNS_DYNAMIC, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Experimental 3D HW accel support for Radeon HD 2xxx, 3xxx and 4xxx. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:01:17 -0000 On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 23:46 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > Hi rnoland. > > Thank you. I'll commit after 7.6.1 release, at least. > > On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 07:51:22 -0600 > Robert Noland wrote: > > Actually, looking through the patch now... Two things jump out at me... > > We can't currently update libdrm in the ports collection without > > breaking nouveau. The second is, don't enable libdrm_radeon, even when > > we can. libdrm_radeon is only needed for TTM/KMS enabled radeon and may > > cause upgrade/build issues if it exists. > > OK. I'll change libdrm_radeon is OPTIONal(default off), and > r600_dri.so installable by libdrm_radeon exists. r600_dri.so from mesa does not require libdrm_radeon. libdrm_radeon is completely unneeded at this point. robert. -- Robert Noland FreeBSD