From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 03:26:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1F0106564A for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 03:26:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from myself@rdtan.net) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9925F8FC13 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 03:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so152284qyk.13 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:26:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.98.146 with SMTP id q18mr2355746vcn.113.1285558001262; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:26:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xhost.local ([115.133.231.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e31sm3307712vbe.19.2010.09.26.20.26.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CA00EEC.2010806@rdtan.net> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:26:36 +0800 From: Edward User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dick Hoogendijk References: <4C9F74DD.6000009@nagual.nl> In-Reply-To: <4C9F74DD.6000009@nagual.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: port upgrading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 03:26:42 -0000 > Woh, I'm confused now. > Question: what is best used to have an up2date ports collection nowadays? "portsnap fetch extract update" for the first time after you've setup the FreeBSD for the very first time. As the parameters used, it fetch the ports tree, extract it to /usr/ports and update it. "portsnap fetch update" every now and then to update the ports tree. In addition, "portmanager" does a good job in managing ports in terms of install/update of ports. It doesn't required ports index to find out what is installed or needs to upgrade as it scans the ports tree for dependency, every time. This is good because I don't have to deal with the problem of ports index getting corrupted. Because of this, it does required more time to install/update ports compare to "portmaster" & "portupgrade". I've recorded some of my experience in using "portmanager" : http://scratching.psybermonkey.net/2010/01/freebsd-how-to-manage-ports-in-freebsd.html My 2 cents, Edward.