Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:25:13 -0500 From: Yoshihiro Ota <ota@j.email.ne.jp> To: =?UTF-8?B?R8OhYm9yIEvDtnZlc2TDoW4=?= <gabor@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ota@j.email.ne.jp, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jakarta-tomcat v.s. tomcat Message-ID: <20081118212513.a37f9f58.ota@j.email.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <491929C1.1070002@FreeBSD.org> References: <20081111010958.da6924e8.ota@j.email.ne.jp> <491929C1.1070002@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:44:17 +0100 Gábor Kövesdán <gabor@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Yoshihiro Ota escribió: > > Hello, forks. > > > > There are 2 directories for apache-tomcat like the following. > > > > % ls -d */*tomcat* > > java/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat www/tomcat41 > > www/jakarta-tomcat4 www/tomcat55 > > www/jakarta-tomcat5 www/tomcat6 > > www/tomcat-native > > > > When I diffed ver. 5 dirs, they looked similar except versions. > > Does anyone know the differences between jakarta-tomcat and tomcat under the ports? > > > Afaik, it used to be known as Jakarta-Tomcat, but its new name is > Tomcat. If you observe it well www/tomcat41 and www/tomcat55 are much > newer version than www/jakarta-tomcat4 and www/jakarta-tomcat5 and there > isn't even www/jakarta-tomcat6. I suggest you should just use > www/tomcat6. I'm also planning to use it and I succeeded to install it > without problems and I can reach it through the port 8180. Indeed, that is one of the answer I had expected. So, if www/tomcat* are the new ones, why don't we remove www/jakarta-tomcat*? Hiro
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081118212513.a37f9f58.ota>