From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 2 19:32:49 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id TAA28221 for current-outgoing; Thu, 2 Mar 1995 19:32:49 -0800 Received: from post.demon.co.uk (post.demon.co.uk [158.152.1.72]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id TAA28213 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 1995 19:32:45 -0800 Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk by post.demon.co.uk id aa18333; 3 Mar 95 3:27 GMT Received: from localhost (gary@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by palmer.demon.co.uk (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id AAA00422; Fri, 3 Mar 1995 00:26:52 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: palmer.demon.co.uk: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Remy CARD , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, jvh@cs.hut.fi Subject: Re: Mach 4 and Lites note available In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 Mar 1995 14:13:02 PST." <10729.794182382@freefall.cdrom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <410.794190396.1@palmer.demon.co.uk> Date: Fri, 03 Mar 1995 00:26:52 +0000 Message-ID: <419.794190412@palmer.demon.co.uk> From: Gary Palmer Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <10729.794182382@freefall.cdrom.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: >Hmmm. I wonder. What would people think about us putting a copy of >LITES on the next FreeBSD 2.1 CDROM? We could include some simple >usage instructions on what LITES was and explain how to layer it onto >the FreeBSD 2.1 installation for intrepid Mach explorers, plus we >could include whatever research papers were relevant. >Comments? I assume that this would be legal? I'd love to see something like this. Dunno about legality tho :-( Gary