From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Oct 20 12:15:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from 2711.dynacom.net (2711.dynacom.net [206.107.213.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B3C37B479 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 12:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from urx.com (dsl1-160.dynacom.net [206.159.132.160]) by 2711.dynacom.net (Build 101 8.9.3/NT-8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA03682; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 12:15:23 -0700 Message-ID: <39F099CB.BC701C70@urx.com> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 12:15:23 -0700 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joseph E. Royce" Cc: Otter , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FW: booting problems with SMP enabled References: <14831.46693.860465.246500@guru.mired.org> <20001020072558.A21782@freyr.cba.ualr.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Joseph E. Royce" wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 06:57:18AM -0400, Otter wrote: > > > > > > }-----Original Message----- > > }From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > }[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Mike Meyer > > }Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 11:05 PM > > }To: Otter > > }Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > }Subject: Re: FW: booting problems with SMP enabled > > } > > } > > }Otter writes: > > }> I've got a new install of 4.1-RELEASE here. > > }> Hardware consists of a dual processor board (unknown brand), > > }> 2 Intel P2-300's, a single 128MB DIMM, onboard scsi > > }> (disabled), on a 13GB IDE drive. The machine boots and runs > > }> fine with a single processor. For testing purposes, I've > > }> swapped them around to make sure that both CPU's are working > > }> as they should. No problems there. When I boot up with the > > }> SMP kernel (only the SMP and APIC_IO lines uncommented) it > > }> hangs in the boot process at where it says "APIC_IO: testing > > }> 8254 interrupt delivery". At this point, the machine locks > > }> and requires me cycling power via the switch on the power > > }> supply. I'm at a loss. I've got a bank of dipdswitches on > > }> the board and have changed a few at random, but no luck so > > }> far. Without knowing the brand of the board, I'm not sure > > }> how I can take this any further. Any tips/ideas/suggestions? TIA. > > } > > }Check the board manufacturers web site for a manual! > > } > > I'd love to, but as you can see above, I don't know who the > > manufacturer is/was. I've found no markings on the board that identify > > it as any particular brand. > > If you can find a FCC ID number on the motherboard then you can do > a search at http://www.fcc.govoet/fccid/ for the manufacturers. This wasn't copied right. I thought it was an important resource and it was missing. I found it had a "/" missing. The address is http://www.fcc.gov/oet/fccid/ Kent > > -Joe > > > > }Also notice that "An SMP kernel will ONLY run on an Intel MP > > }spec. qualified motherboard" and "Be sure to disable 'cpu > > }I386_CPU' && > > }'cpu I486_CPU' for SMP kernels." (The latter may not be required for > > }your version, but won't hurt in any case). > > > > already done. > > > > } > > }Also, check the stepping number of the P2's (on the chip, somewhere, > > }one hopes, or possibly in dmesg when the system boots) and then check > > }the intel web to make sure the two chips will work *together*. While > > }each may work fine, if you've don't have compatible stepping numbers, > > }they won't work together. > > } > > } > } > > The stepping numbers DO match. I've searched Intel's site and found > > some CPUID info charts, but nothing that states they work together... > > then again, I didn't find anything saying the contrary. I seem to > > remember that was the big hype of P2 over Celerons-- they had more > > cache and would support SMP. I could only assume that they all do... > > and neer had problems getting any p2 or p3's to work in SMP as long as > > the stepping numbers matched. I've set this up on several machines in > > the past, so I know (or at least I used to!) what to look for and the > > steps to take to make it happen. I'm just at a loss on this one. > > -Otter > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message