From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Mar 5 2: 5: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp [210.234.123.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D9337B9AC; Sun, 5 Mar 2000 02:05:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from knu@idaemons.org) Received: from daemon.local.idaemons.org (pc343042.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp [203.140.143.42]) by ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (8.9.1/3.7W 06/01/99) with ESMTP id TAA25386; Sun, 5 Mar 2000 19:05:03 +0900 (JST) Received: by daemon.local.idaemons.org (8.9.3/3.7W) id TAA93288; Sun, 5 Mar 2000 19:04:32 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 19:04:31 +0900 Message-ID: <863dq591hs.wl@daemon.local.idaemons.org> From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" To: jim@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, saken@hotel.rmta.org Subject: Re: review of update for tidy port In-Reply-To: In your message of "Sun, 5 Mar 2000 01:08:43 -0800" <20000305010843.A64205@luna.cdrom.com> References: <20000305010843.A64205@luna.cdrom.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.2.18 (Please Forgive Me) EMIKO/1.13.12 (Euglena sociabilis) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 Emacs/20.5 (i386--freebsd) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN) Organization: Associated I. Daemons MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.13.12 - "Euglena sociabilis") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, At Sun, 5 Mar 2000 01:08:43 -0800, Jim Mock wrote: > -DISTNAME= tidy30nov99 > -PKGNAME= tidy-0.11.99.2 > +DISTNAME= tidy13jan00 > +PKGNAME= tidy-0.01.00.1 Doesn't it look weird to lower the version number on upgrade? I guess some people may and `pkg_version' will judge 0.01.00.1 is older than 0.11.99.2. I suppose `tidy-yyyymmdd' style is clearly better for the convenience of comparison. Isn't it? -- / /__ __ / ) ) ) ) / Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( "If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message