From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 28 12:22:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gratis.grondar.za (gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F0515669 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 12:21:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from greenpeace.grondar.za (greenpeace.grondar.za [196.7.18.132]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id WAA54861; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 22:21:38 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greenpeace.grondar.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA11912; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 22:21:37 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <199903282021.WAA11912@greenpeace.grondar.za> To: John Polstra Cc: dv@dv.ru, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -stable problem In-Reply-To: Your message of " Sun, 28 Mar 1999 11:27:00 PST." <199903281927.LAA12227@vashon.polstra.com> References: <199903281927.LAA12227@vashon.polstra.com> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 22:21:36 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Polstra wrote: > I can't think of any reasonable explanation for this. The assertion > is in the dynamic linker. But it already did its job long ago, before > the first message ("Trying x.x.x.x...") was printed. I can only guess > that telnet is making a random jump which happens to land in the > middle of the dynamic linker code. Maybe it's a kernel bug. ...or the error was printed by telnetd (on the other side). M To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message