From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 00:10:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA6216A419 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:10:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9EA13C469 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:10:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E23B2092; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:10:15 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: -0.3/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414BE2090; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:10:15 +0100 (CET) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1F1D784492; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:10:15 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Rainer Duffner References: <86r6fdx0tf.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080216113721.GA55702@voi.aagh.net> <86tzk8vnz9.fsf@ds4.des.no> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:10:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Rainer Duffner's message of "Sat\, 16 Feb 2008 18\:16\:25 +0100") Message-ID: <86ve4n15w8.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RC2 Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:10:21 -0000 Rainer Duffner writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > Don't blame me for your decision to use the most expensive type of > > storage available, especially when it has been conclusively shown > > that expensive server-grade disks are no more reliable than cheap > > consumer- grade disks. > I think you are unfair. In some servers (Blades come to mind - but > they're not the only ones) you just can't plug in a 500 GB WD SATA2 > disk. You've got to use either SAS or SAN-boot. In that case, you need to find a better server supplier. (yes, I've seen blades that take 3.5" disks) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no