From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 13 22:31:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id 1B7BA1065679; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:31:53 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: ??????? ??????? Message-ID: <20101113223153.GA17284@freebsd.org> References: <832450377.20101113214858@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <832450377.20101113214858@yandex.ru> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BUG: sysctl net.isr.swi_count negative value X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:31:53 -0000 On Sat Nov 13 10, ??????? ??????? wrote: > Hi, Freebsd-questions. > net.isr.swi_count: -1692211928 > > as I think count can not be negative. in this case it is. > Is this a bug or negative value means some special? what is the output of 'uname -a'? looks like a 32 bit integer is being used for net.isr.swi_count which you managed to overrun. i'm running HEAD and that sysctl parameter doesn't exist: otaku% sysctl net.isr.swi_count sysctl: unknown oid 'net.isr.swi_count' seems pluknet posted the same one year ago [1] cheers. alex [1] http://markmail.org/message/qc34d5z6uyyet7nx > > -- > ? ?????????, > ??????? mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru > -- a13x