Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:56:57 +0000
From:      Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
To:        Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com>
Cc:        Guilherme Starvaggi <guisf@empresario.com.br>
Subject:   Re: netra t1
Message-ID:  <20031127095657.GC16346@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <44ekvuke20.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
References:  <a05100300bbeaa437f596@[200.138.50.113]> <44ekvuke20.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--/Uq4LBwYP4y1W6pO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 04:36:23PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Guilherme Starvaggi <guisf@empresario.com.br> writes:
>=20
> > I would like to know if the computer - NETRA T1 150 from SUN -
> > support the FREEBSD system? I am thinking in buy this computer, but I
> > have no experience with servers like this, and either with the
> > FREEBSD. I have a little experience with the usual LINUX. Do you think
> > it is good to try this change?
>=20
> FreeBSD has only very rough support for that type of hardware at this
> time.  NetBSD has supported it for years, and is a similar operating
> system. =20

Err... sparc64 is now a tier 1 supported architecture in 5.x: see
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.1R/hardware-sparc64.html and
http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/sparc.html

Support is rather better than "rough", although there are apparently
some problems installing using the Sun console -- you should use a
serial console instead.  It's also the case that 5.x is not really
suitable for a production system yet: the releases are marked as "New
Technology" -- see
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.1R/early-adopter.html This also
makes 5.x rather less suitable for FreeBSD beginners.

The soon to be released version 5.2 (due early in December) should be
yet another leap in stability and performance.  That release might be
most appropriate for the OP if he's willing to wait for it.

	Cheers,

	Matthew=20


--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                       26 The Paddocks
                                                      Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey         Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614                                  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK

--/Uq4LBwYP4y1W6pO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/xcppdtESqEQa7a0RAoUQAJ9pQ88m3picoHGMOIs6t9y6ai2l1ACgjaJA
sg7oriEoUQZdxY8wGT9pMTY=
=0wct
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--/Uq4LBwYP4y1W6pO--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031127095657.GC16346>