From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 24 16:07:30 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA12207 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 16:07:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA12202 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 16:07:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA01731; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 16:07:48 -0800 (PST) To: John Robert LoVerso cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Current's availability In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 24 Jan 1999 19:05:37 EST." <199901250005.TAA27514@loverso.southborough.ma.us> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 16:07:48 -0800 Message-ID: <1728.917222868@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On another note, does current@freebsd.org now correspond to 4.X ("-current") > discussions, while stable@freebsd.org now correspond to 3.X ("-stable")? Basically, yes. > If so, is there / will there be a separate forum for 2.X ("-stable in a > past life")? I think we could probably discuss those questions in -stable as well since that list doesn't get anywhere near as much traffic as -current in any case, and many of the interested users overlap. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message