Date: 08 Nov 1999 01:08:03 -0800 From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: "Pedro Fernando Giffuni" <pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> Cc: "R. Imura" <imura@cs.titech.ac.jp>, andrews@technologist.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Possible change in the Qt port. Message-ID: <vqc7ljtmjv0.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: "Pedro Fernando Giffuni"'s message of "Sun, 07 Nov 1999 11:01:19 -0500" References: <38209354.5A0E1416@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> <3.0.6.32.19991103230433.008afc90@mail.psn.net> <19991106044140H.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> <vqcaeoqpseq.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <3825A24F.A98124BC@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: "Pedro Fernando Giffuni" <pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co>
* There is a binary: moc, AFAIK it's onlt used during the building process
* in some ports and they expect to find it in $(QTDIR)/bin.
Is it a problem to tell those ports that QTDIR=${PREFIX} ?
* Not really; we already use this approach when the port wants to create
* it's own directory. The example that comes to mind is Scilab. Lesstif is
* a case where NOT applying this is clearly violating hier().
Just because the rule isn't enforced in all cases doesn't make the
rule invalid. :)
-PW
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqc7ljtmjv0.fsf>