Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 07:33:06 +0200 From: Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net> To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Cc: Martin Ziegler <martin.ziegler@cevibasel.ch> Subject: Re: PVR-150 improvements Message-ID: <200809040733.07452.shoesoft@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <67921C73D4E24B8E9B51A1E79CDF7F2D@leaf101> References: <20080903120019.EF0CB10656AB@hub.freebsd.org> <67921C73D4E24B8E9B51A1E79CDF7F2D@leaf101>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 22:24:53 Martin Ziegler wrote: > > Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 11:15:45 +0200 > > From: Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net> > > Subject: PVR-150 improvements > > To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org > > Message-ID: <200809031115.45753.shoesoft@gmx.net> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > > I recently acquired a PVR-150 card and had some issues with > > the pvrxxx port. I ... > Nice work. > > I've 2 notes: > - The directory pvrxxx/work and is not present by default. > So you can't patch the files directly. Should have mentioned that. It works if you run "make patch" in the pvrxxx directory and apply the patch afterwards. The reason for this was readability. E.g. tveeprom.c is only available as patch in the files directory. And I find patches against patches rather ugly. > - Works with a PVR-150 or a PVR-350 but not both at the > same time. If both are present in the system, only the PVR-350 > works (as cxm1). Not sure about the PVR-350. But at least it breaks the PVR-250 remote (which is fatal I think). The current patch is just for testing and might break other cards. This has to be fixed if it should be included in the main source. -- Stefan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200809040733.07452.shoesoft>