Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 20:13:51 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 261977] lang/gcc12-devel: enable LTO Message-ID: <bug-261977-29464-w1Ah2lQB9s@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-261977-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-261977-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D261977 --- Comment #27 from Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com> --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #25) Looks like there has not been an aarch64 or amd64 30,000+ bulk -a with gcc11 LTO style yet. But looking at amd64's: http://beefy16.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=3D130amd64-default&bui= ld=3Dcb1788291f45=20 proved surprising: gcc12-devel-12.0.1.s20220306_2 success 08:05:31 gcc11-devel-11.2.1.s20211009_1 success 15:26:37 Both show: --with-build-config=3Dbootstrap-lto-noplugin Did one run with more parallelism allowed --or just less activity by other builders in the bulk -a over the time of the specific gcc build? For reference for non-LTO style: gcc11-11.2.0 success 04:08:59 So the gcc12-devel-12.0.1.s20220306_2 time still suggests the LTO status of the build. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-261977-29464-w1Ah2lQB9s>