From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 19:59:43 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509842FF0D8 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 19:59:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ultimatedns.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49NzlM0v9zz4NKT; Fri, 15 May 2020 19:59:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (localhost [IPv6:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04FJxxFe057521 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 15 May 2020 13:00:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from portmaster@BSDforge.com) X-Mailer: Cypht MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Mark Millard , "Danilo G. Baio" , In-Reply-To: <20200515180554.GD51382@www.zefox.net> From: Chris Reply-To: portmaster@BSDforge.com To: bob prohaska Subject: Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3 Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 13:00:05 -0700 Message-Id: <7999b60a10d3d7ac0a2142f87c2be34a@udns.ultimatedns.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49NzlM0v9zz4NKT X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.53 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.55)[-0.553,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.974,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US]; local_wl_ip(0.00)[24.113.41.81] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 19:59:43 -0000 On Fri, 15 May 2020 11:05:54 -0700 bob prohaska fbsd@www=2Ezefox=2Enet said > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:49:21PM -0300, Danilo G=2E Baio wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:19:22AM -0700, bob prohaska wrote: > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-po= rts > > wrote: > > > >=20 > > > > Some building and isntalling had to occur prior to the > > > > textproc/py-sphinx18 build attempt, possibly from > > > > prior session(s) of building and installing=2E > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > In this case x11/xorg was the first port attempted in a new > > > ports tree=2E The only "prior sessions" would have been within > > > the dependencies of x11/xorg=2E Is that resolvable by poudriere? > > >=20 > > > > textproc/py-sphinx18 is new as of 2020-May-11=2E > > > > The devel/llvm[16789]0 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 =2E > > > > Only about 26 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 but > > > > I'll not list the others=2E > > > >=20 > > > > textproc/py-sphinx has been around longer and has > > > > 142 ports that require it=2E I'll not list them=2E > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > textproc/py-sphinx18/Makefile lists: > > > >=20 > > > > CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx > > > >=20 > > > > textproc/py-sphinx/Makefile lists: > > > >=20 > > > > CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx18 > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > So, for example, indirectly the devel/llvm[16789]0 > > > > ports conflict with at least 142 other ports because > > > > of the textproc/py-sphinx* difference in requirements=2E > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > The conflict is real and limits what combinations > > > > of ports you may have installed at the same time=2E > > >=20 > > > I'll try deinstalling the conflicting port and hope > > > it won't be required later=2E=2E=2E=2E > >=20 > > It seems that just devel/llvm80 is pulling sphinx18 when building > > x11/xorg=2E > >=20 > > Try disabling DOCS option on devel/llvm80 for now=2E > >=20 > > I've opened a PR to track this issue: > > https://bugs=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/bugzilla/show_bug=2Ecgi?id=3D246487 > >=20 >=20 > Wish I'd known it was only the DOCS option! Too late now, > sphinx18 is deinstalled and llvm80 is building=2E >=20 > This is probably a dumb question, but is there some way > to learn at the outset what conflicts need to be worked > around? Something like a "make conflicts" target? Seemingly=20 > it could be done by hand, but that promises to be tedious=2E I think run-depends-list, build-depends-list, or all-depends-list should give you what you seek=2E :-) --Chris >=20 > At best 8-) >=20 > Thanks for writing! >=20 > bob prohaska >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd=2Eorg mailing list > https://lists=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd=2Eorg"