From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 24 06:40:26 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E532F08
 for <net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 06:40:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22d.google.com (mail-pd0-x22d.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22d])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2991B99D
 for <net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 06:40:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id z10so4911384pdj.18
 for <net@freebsd.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 23:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=Vdt+5Xdc78LeQ7D5y4Jj5ZdX3FbmjJ0KIIRE9pi9nkU=;
 b=Zyzws8OAcMaC12RWWRKU4kUeVC6pRzj8aKk5ilg0YJv2sjVl4IIX0bhVAF52E7xFdW
 eVY++Wm47NMcLG/ZLXHovU8V8PndsLrG+zhbRGOhT6oSauQRS65idjk+ybPE9By47EVy
 FfD3WJZ7p5PWHEgGUrlsYvIOhsb4Vk9snDwEbJw5ihN2AV1nAVdvdLb/hqFCBzH0q3X6
 0/9WHa0EYO8jOKX4q7eydEtxYczlEr80CpLBD6WIUU/iirC813XEBzRVbnC5hcAtQvZo
 ujcukNSJoYjW5P51MadixGTvHA2zwXV9nqbB0pOtKS/iWbIeoR7bgrOWHFvFAOr/U2rN
 0FiA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.40.138 with SMTP id x10mr70741301pbk.8.1395643225816;
 Sun, 23 Mar 2014 23:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.128.9 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 23:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:10:25 +0530
Message-ID: <CADDTU+CxQdkzktGnvj4SqpG2N-ccN1vNThtQUoue1H00Dkaf5A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Handling Jumbo Packets
From: soumya panigrahi <soumyapanigrahi@gmail.com>
To: rizzo.unipi@gmail.com, giuseppe.lettieri73@gmail.com, v.maffione@gmail.com,
 net@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 06:40:26 -0000

Hi,

First of all I would like to thank you all for developing an awesome packet
capturing framework.
I have been using it recently and find it very very fast and efficient.

However off late I am trying to capture Jumbo packets on the network for
the following scenario's but that doesn't seem to be working.

Please suggest in its present form is NetMap capable of handling the below
scenario's w.r.t Jumbo frames? If how do we have to some special handling
w.r.t to this?

1) Netmap is receiving un-fragmented Jumbo frame. In this case is NetMap
capable of passing on the Jumbo packet to the user?
2) Netmap receving fragmented Jumbo frames. In this case is NetMap capable
of reassembling the fragmented packets and deliver the assembled packet to
the user?

I have been stuck with this issue for some time now. A quick response would
help a great deal.

Thanks,
Soumya Panigrahi