Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:20:05 -0700
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        Dovydas Kulvinskas <dovydas@kada.lt>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [Fwd: PR broken? was Re: Linux not FreeBSD?] 
Message-ID:  <199907141920.MAA01005@dingo.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:03:22 %2B0200." <378C525A.59DD2134@kada.lt> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>  I think it's not only 32-bit but 64-bit OS - Linux for Alpha. & what
> about FreeBSD for alpha? Linux is better than FreeBSD. Better programing
> platform, more scalable & reliable. For FreeBSD is very difficult to use
> glibc & for Linux it's native libraries.

That's because nobody in their right mind uses glibc unless they're 
forced to, ie. Linux users.

-- 
\\  The mind's the standard       \\  Mike Smith
\\  of the man.                   \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\    -- Joseph Merrick           \\  msmith@cdrom.com




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907141920.MAA01005>