Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:48:49 -0500 From: Robert Hough <rch@acidpit.org> To: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Feeding the Troll (Was: freebsd as a desktop ?) Message-ID: <20011129154849.A47136@acidpit.org> In-Reply-To: <02b101c1790e$e802df90$0a00000a@atkielski.com>; from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com on Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 20:49:02 %2B0100 References: <15365.11290.211107.464324@guru.mired.org> <006101c17854$c6aa2570$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <01112817112006.13219@prime.vsservices.com> <016301c17888$c1be3cc0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20011129115922.GA75539@hades.hell.gr> <02b101c1790e$e802df90$0a00000a@atkielski.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > Because a single-user system does not have the overhead of a > multiuser system, and it is more ergonomic as well. Why when I see you write ergonomic, do I keep thinking of the movie "The Princess Bride"? Anthony: ergonomic! Inigo Montoya: You keep using that word. I do not think it means, what you think it means. Sorry, I'm getting old. I just have a hard time fitting your use of the word ergonomics into the discussion at hand. Perhaps I just don't have all that definitions for ergonomic in my head? -- Robert Hough (rch@acidpit.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011129154849.A47136>