Date: Mon, 08 Nov 1999 08:50:50 -0500 From: "Pedro Fernando Giffuni" <pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "R. Imura" <imura@cs.titech.ac.jp>, andrews@technologist.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Possible change in the Qt port. Message-ID: <3826D53A.D584DCED@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> References: <38209354.5A0E1416@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> <3.0.6.32.19991103230433.008afc90@mail.psn.net> <19991106044140H.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> <vqcaeoqpseq.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <3825A24F.A98124BC@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> <vqc7ljtmjv0.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
>
> * From: "Pedro Fernando Giffuni" <pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co>
>
> * There is a binary: moc, AFAIK it's onlt used during the building process
> * in some ports and they expect to find it in $(QTDIR)/bin.
>
> Is it a problem to tell those ports that QTDIR=${PREFIX} ?
>
You hit the point: I don't care where it is as long as we have a QTDIR.
It collides with qt1, so currently we are patching everything to find
$(PREFIX)/lib/libqt2, $(PREFIX)/include/qt2, and $(PREFIX)/bin/moc2.
> * Not really; we already use this approach when the port wants to create
> * it's own directory. The example that comes to mind is Scilab. Lesstif is
> * a case where NOT applying this is clearly violating hier().
>
> Just because the rule isn't enforced in all cases doesn't make the
> rule invalid. :)
>
In Scilab's case you suggested this solution as the correct one :).
cheers,
Pedro.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3826D53A.D584DCED>