From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 22 08:18:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDDBB544 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 08:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647318D1 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 08:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk (storm.tdx.co.uk [62.13.130.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/) with ESMTP id s9M8IlV4021143 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:18:47 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:18:48 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz To: Gregory Orange , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update - upgrade from 9.1-RELEASE to 9.3-RELEASE - requries all ports rebuilt? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <54470368.5050708@calorieking.com> References: <517BECC5D916EAC560741895@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <54470368.5050708@calorieking.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 08:18:51 -0000 --On 22 October 2014 09:07 +0800 Gregory Orange wrote: > Upon advice that we could probably ignore the warning, we've had no > trouble after upgrading 8.3-RELEASE to 8.4-RELEASE. We've slowly rebuilt > ports anyway, but that's more because of newer versions available than > because of this warning. Thanks - I've had to ignore it for now (and it seems OK), while I work out the best way of taking the box down for longer... 'freebsd-update' could really do with something to dump out what it's going to do (i.e. if it says it wants to remove files, having it dump a list would be really handy ;) -Kp