From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 15:26:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8990016A420 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:26:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@g-mapps.com) Received: from valium.tcm.gmapps.net.uk (valium.tcm.gmapps.net.uk [194.207.235.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C0843D48 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:26:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@g-mapps.com) Received: from [62.24.226.220] ([62.24.226.220]) (authenticated bits=0) by valium.tcm.gmapps.net.uk (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1RFTjuv018833; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:29:45 GMT (envelope-from danny@g-mapps.com) Message-ID: <44031A0E.9060402@g-mapps.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:26:06 +0000 From: Danny Butroyd User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060123) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Tancsa References: <4402F009.1000407@g-mapps.com> <6.2.3.4.0.20060227093542.086c56c0@64.7.153.2> <44031194.8000300@g-mapps.com> <6.2.3.4.0.20060227095704.085300c8@64.7.153.2> In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.0.20060227095704.085300c8@64.7.153.2> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on valium.tcm.gmapps.net.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfs woes in FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:26:20 -0000 Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 09:49 AM 27/02/2006, Danny Butroyd wrote: >> I have tried both tcp and udp mounts and have the same issues, the >> version of nfs is v3 (the default I believe). >> >> Is it possible to implement any of the NFS changes/tweaks on my current >> version? > > Not really as there are many changes behind the scenes that impact it. > Its not just the nfsd binary that has changed. There are a lot of > kernel stuff in support of it that has changed. OK, do the changes affect both server and client and is there any documentation on the changes? > > BTW, if you are using tcp mounts, and you have devices not on the same > subnet, setting > net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0 > helps with performance. However, this is a separate issue to the > problems you are seeing. > Yeah, I saw this in the list archives :) Danny > ---Mike > > >> Danny > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >