From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 25 17:52:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C1E16A403 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:52:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3115843D5A for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:52:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3PHq2xG006472; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:52:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.3P/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k3PHq1Y7059757 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:52:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.0.20060425134955.051d58d0@64.7.153.2> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:51:30 -0400 To: Stephen.Clark@seclark.us From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <444E5608.4050704@seclark.us> References: <444E2503.9090506@seclark.us> <6.2.3.4.0.20060425093417.068dfc08@64.7.153.2> <444E5608.4050704@seclark.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd Stable 6.x ipsec slower than with 4.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:52:05 -0000 At 01:02 PM 25/04/2006, Stephen Clark wrote: >>Try first >>sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0 >> >>If its still slower, try using FAST_IPSEC instead on the >>server. However, make sure you disable INET6 >That increased it to 39mbits/sec. Still far from 54mbits/sec Are all of the TCP params (compare sysctl -a net.inet.tcp on both )and application defaults still the same on both systems ? One that that for sure is not in RELENG_4 is SACK. Try disabling that and see if there is a difference. ---Mike