Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:15:02 +0100 (BST) From: Stacey Roberts <stacey@vickiandstacey.com> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: flz@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/99609: pkg_version shows update for ldconfig_compat-1.0_7, attempts to portupgrade fails with Port marked Message-ID: <200606291415.k5TEF2D0099302@crom.vickiandstacey.com> Resent-Message-ID: <200606291440.k5TEeKEG074245@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 99609
>Category: ports
>Synopsis: pkg_version shows update for ldconfig_compat-1.0_7, attempts to portupgrade fails with Port marked
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Thu Jun 29 14:40:20 GMT 2006
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Stacey Roberts
>Release: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE i386
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD crom.vickiandstacey.com 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0: Wed May 17 18:45:00 BST 2006 root@crom.vickiandstacey.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CROM i386
>Description:
After fresh cvsup of ports tree.
pkg_version -v | grep -i "<" returns the following:
ldconfig_compat-1.0_7 < needs updating (port has 1.0_8)
HOwever attempts to portupgrade this port fails as follows:
# portupgrade ldconfig_compat-1.0_7
** Port marked as IGNORE: misc/ldconfig_compat:
isn't needed (part of base rc.d)
#
>How-To-Repeat:
Cvsup ports tree
Attempt to update the port
>Fix:
Don't know.
If its not required, then why is it being reported as having an available update?
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
as IGNORE: misc/ldconfig_compat: isn't needed (part of base rc.d)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200606291415.k5TEF2D0099302>