From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 23 22:16:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329201065673 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:16:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacombar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5128FC19 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so10845509iwn.13 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:16:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sEUkYxlV5UWiRfg9dVWgydV+OsPnrcQGFvzUqVK8wzI=; b=GTWTfieRjX1FagF0KbaEpXPTcCwHFyYVmxGo85Lf+kZJeAkagekqZ0yxuYjQ31vu83 WhGFFnN49AagYMMYx+MuzKU6SQuNJ3bi7IuydSsSApBaTXoq6CO+laPtZeRMg++EhmvU CiBmL852xynG47FSrMVVNXFrXAxsc8Io8IhVU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=hVTP4yURRIaSuTB74OOwscnpwKZgTp2CLQKYgZpq302nqfQ0qSZ0o3F+ao2dXHOUEo BAComSY4oH0woze7rH46XCD6UCQkzhxX9Upgn4qx1jkWe2GMp7vVl66LsGYcPoEI43BH mK9kP0MFQw+XPdHI+RY2z/r1N42lP/WbRg8y4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.63.72 with SMTP id xd8mr7786icb.215.1300917005677; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:50:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.146.72 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:50:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <86mxkm1erm.fsf@gmail.com> <86aaglx1ow.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:50:05 -0400 Message-ID: From: Arnaud Lacombe To: Zhihao Yuan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Pan Tsu Subject: Re: [GSoC] About the idea: Unicode support in vi X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:16:40 -0000 Hi, On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Zhihao Yuan wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Pan Tsu wrote: >> Zhihao Yuan writes: >>> I'm not sure whether the FreeBSD system administrators (who opens 100 >>> ssh sessions) agree with that to replace the nvi in base system with >>> this one. >> >> Do they expect more features beyond POSIX vi? > > Like multiple windows. This has been discussed y other BSDs before. > For the reference, on the Linux side, busybox do all what an admin would reasonably expect (I mean _all_ the basic userland, not just editing text) in a binary smaller than nvi. Now, it's true that _you_ might not care about size/bloat, at least accept that some do. - Arnaud