From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Mar 27 13: 4:47 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.1.175])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E500637BE6A
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 13:04:41 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za)
	by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1)
	id 12Zgga-000FR3-00; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 23:04:32 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: questions asked in CURRENT, answered in UPDATING 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 27 Mar 2000 11:22:42 MST."
             <200003271822.LAA94849@harmony.village.org> 
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 23:04:32 +0200
Message-ID: <59335.954191072@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Mon, 27 Mar 2000 11:22:42 MST, Warner Losh wrote:

> It also tends to self regulate the UPDATING usage.  As usage falls,
> more messages are likely to appear on the list, to which the see
> updating replies happen, which causes usage to rise again.

Two good arguments.  Idea sumamrily dismissed. :-)

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message