Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:04:04 -0300
From:      Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk>
To:        Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
Cc:        Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, "doc@freebsd.org" <doc@freebsd.org>, "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Call for Documentation Contributors
Message-ID:  <95629F52-ADF7-4D96-8153-4C9C4E894780@rulez.sk>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim-60%2BTeBRdK8hMCVQihq1hTNwwPkoU87H5%2BaDN@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTim=VBiPgEpo=j6BVxHRB2on%2BcaJaGHsUwzGoBao@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinVhbb3aK%2BKCEe_4Y7kx00844HW7pktmJwPnR%2Bj@mail.gmail.com> <20100902080219.GH64651@hoeg.nl> <45764F17-2279-4520-93D7-8F0B8BE991DE@rulez.sk> <AANLkTim-60%2BTeBRdK8hMCVQihq1hTNwwPkoU87H5%2BaDN@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 3.9.2010, at 1:10, Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> wrote:

>>=20
> Wouldn't it be a lot easier to have a nice article on installing
> /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-* from the date of the release of the installe=
d
> system?  Or maybe offer archive web access to a handbook snapshot from tha=
t
> date(Django does something similar)?

FYI we have archive of hadbooks and FAQs for past releases at http://docs.fr=
eebsd.org/doc/. People just often don't know or are lazy to browse there, ev=
en though I believe it is linked from the footer of the handbook. The proble=
m here is that we happen to cover all the supported releases in a single han=
dbook which simply leads to confusion...on the other hand you may be right t=
hat discrepancies don't happen that often and the additional work is not wor=
th it.

> Maintaining separate handbook  branches
> seems unrealistic if there aren't enough doc contributors to maintain one t=
o
> expectations, and IME discrepancies aren't very frequent.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?95629F52-ADF7-4D96-8153-4C9C4E894780>