Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 10:44:31 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Filesystems <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Any success stories for HAST + ZFS? Message-ID: <20110402084431.GB1849@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=hP9RoGRKLacxQKSL_6XzwKJZxAh_OeoT2W3EX@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTi=hP9RoGRKLacxQKSL_6XzwKJZxAh_OeoT2W3EX@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--s2ZSL+KKDSLx8OML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 01:36:32PM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote: > [Not sure which list is most appropriate since it's using HAST + ZFS > on -RELEASE, -STABLE, and -CURRENT. Feel free to trim the CC: on > replies.] >=20 > I'm having a hell of a time making this work on real hardware, and am > not ruling out hardware issues as yet, but wanted to get some > reassurance that someone out there is using this combination (FreeBSD > + HAST + ZFS) successfully, without kernel panics, without core dumps, > without deadlocks, without issues, etc. I need to know I'm not > chasing a dead rabbit. I just committed a fix for a problem that might look like a deadlock. With trociny@ patch and my last fix (to GEOM GATE and hastd) do you still have any issues? --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com FreeBSD committer http://www.FreeBSD.org Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://yomoli.com --s2ZSL+KKDSLx8OML Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk2W4e8ACgkQForvXbEpPzT5MQCcCyNhQpd0Ql+wNhlciiNm1N+w m1YAoKJX8PAnwxzQy/U+myNAt0tIeUjU =xeh6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s2ZSL+KKDSLx8OML--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110402084431.GB1849>