From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 9 00:40:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE3916A400 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 00:40:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C9E13C458 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 00:40:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5994D1A3C19 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:40:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3209513AE for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 20:40:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A195EC219; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 20:40:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 20:40:22 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: User Questions Message-ID: <20070609004022.GA54574@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20070608170345.4134.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> <20070608211222.GA48994@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20070608202759.E926.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070608202759.E926.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: Increase in the number of ports: upgrade xorg to 7.2... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 00:40:23 -0000 On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:30:01PM -0400, Gerard wrote: > On June 08, 2007 at 05:12PM Kris Kennaway wrote: > > [snip] > > > FYI, if you'd used an upgrade tool like portupgrade it would have been > > seamless because portupgrade keeps the old library version around for > > precisely this reason. > > Actually, I ended up using portmanager with the '-p' flag to force > updating of all dependencies no matter how far down the dependency > tree they were. OK, but the point about the cause of your problems stands. If you're going to complain about dependency problems, you should consider instead using a tool that is mature enough to handle them without causing problems. Kris