Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 19 Mar 2017 14:03:36 -0600
From:      Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>
To:        Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>
Cc:        Ethan Grammatikidis <eekee57@fastmail.fm>, FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: portmaster installation trampling on my binary packages???
Message-ID:  <52E6B873-E461-474C-9A7D-4A56D1813FDC@adamw.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1tWawRnYY4Fzvux8PgrZsN_aRZQhEHE4%2BuQVqehcWLqMw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <1489948526.907848.916282096.587A8CA0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAN6yY1tWawRnYY4Fzvux8PgrZsN_aRZQhEHE4%2BuQVqehcWLqMw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 19 Mar, 2017, at 13:54, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Then I run 'pkg upgrade' regularly. This will update any ports that =
have
> been modified since you installed your system.

Everything that Kevin said is right on the money, but I wanted to =
highlight this in particular.

If you've installed from packages, you want to run "pkg upgrade" to keep =
your system up-to-date, not "portmaster -a".

pkg is the best tool for managing packages. portmaster wasn't written =
for binary packages.

# Adam


--=20
Adam Weinberger
adamw@adamw.org
https://www.adamw.org





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52E6B873-E461-474C-9A7D-4A56D1813FDC>