From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 15 14:43:01 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57906CEF;
 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:43:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-x233.google.com (mail-ob0-x233.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13A232D5F;
 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:43:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id wn1so3930064obc.38
 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 07:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=QLsnRGd+x4aabDjGpI5LWYgd9R3vcYzj0nCVmAXuaes=;
 b=I2saHWZiUcv3nZ3I5PxFC+uaCH5DPJyrjo6Z53ebIxfsSGQSNaQ5uNsAJ0jEK6Rpbf
 +QjlvkZ77MkDbDSNlZ/4Kf6QTLQ/im66ixfe0O+g5FQty6v+7B53SiHDDX7d6NOMdj2c
 pm40VDbk5sVxPV4iJUtDzS/60yUrua4u/vF7/t5BsCzsYPfR5jkJYdj/SOu6ZiZFqs7y
 EaejT7GAeluLYcwgUe4BLm+alcnKFUMl9TihmbySeM27T/r09ToPG4mWlApw1xU5MpHO
 9c0nju0tW3RvuCEaVBNvGp+ZGM79x14vL5IfBkb6H+JdINbbroHMfSKIW0PNQP6bnC4/
 ca8g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.29.199 with SMTP id m7mr26461137obh.47.1405435377979;
 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 07:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: r.c.ladan@gmail.com
Received: by 10.182.146.5 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 07:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140715124819.GU93051@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
References: <CADL2u4gw7VSvuYwk_N26QnrOCyBd71=-R9U225372vYPEVz=Bw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140715124819.GU93051@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 16:42:57 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: PVNGHjNiBWNqIdDvc_u9k_wsNQw
Message-ID: <CADL2u4gSNkUWnjBAkeqBzesvP+bJUUv7kHuz=Qs8ZTgtcz3How@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: marking vulnerable ports forbidden?
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9_Ladan?= <rene@freebsd.org>
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18
Cc: "ports@freebsd.org Ports" <ports@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:43:01 -0000

2014-07-15 14:48 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>:

> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 02:45:19PM +0200, Ren=C3=A9 Ladan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > according to Freshports [1] there are currently 24 vulnerable ports not
> > marked as forbidden.
> > How about checking this list on a regular basis and marking such ports
> and
> > forbidden and optionally as deprecated? This would inform users not usi=
ng
> > vuxml earlier about vulnerabilities.
> >
> > [1] http://www.freshports.org/ports-vulnerable.php
>
> Please mark them as forbidden
>
> In progress... I marked all relevant ports as forbidden locally. For some
ports the  vulnerability information is wrong, e.g. x11/nvidia-driver-96 is
a false positive.
I'll have to filter ports with multiple vulnerabilities.

Regards,
Ren=C3=A9