Date: 29 Sep 2004 09:26:07 -0400 From: Dan Pelleg <daniel+bsd@pelleg.org> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Peter Schultz <pete@beforever.com> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: named now runs chroot'ed by default Message-ID: <u2ssm91mck0.fsf@lark.auton.cs.cmu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20040928142532.M90002@qbhto.arg> References: <20040928025635.Q5094@ync.qbhto.arg> <727FCC18-1156-11D9-BBA6-000D936BE398@beforever.com> <20040928142532.M90002@qbhto.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> writes: > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Peter Schultz wrote: > > > Why not do it FreeBSD style and auto-jail named? > > The simplest answer is that not every host can burn (or even obtain) an > extra IP address for the jail. It's also questionable what additional > benefit would be obtained. > Benefit question aside, it's possible to run the jail on a RFC1918 address, and run NAT on the host to make that fact transparent. A ugly hack, but it definitely works. -- Dan Pelleg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?u2ssm91mck0.fsf>