Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 22:18:46 -0400 (EDT) From: "John W. DeBoskey" <jwd@unx.sas.com> To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@hub.freebsd.org> Cc: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, jwd@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/df df.1 df.c Message-ID: <200006050218.WAA20146@bb01f39.unx.sas.com> In-Reply-To: <20000605012128.CFBE237B555@hub.freebsd.org> from "Jonathan M. Bresler" at "Jun 4, 2000 06:21:28 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > > > > That's called `BLOCKSIZE=1G df', thank you very much. > > > > BZZZZT. You could do df -k with `BLOCKSIZE=1K df' too but I don't see > [snip] > > FWIW, I didn't like the idea of another flag much either (we gonna add > > -g to du(1) next? It has a -k flag too) but I couldn't argue against > > it from a POLA or consistency standpoint (there is -k AND there is > > yes, seems if we are going to add -g to df, we should add it > to du as well. just one and not the other is confusing. simarily we > should add a -m to both df and du. having -k and -g but not -m is > very strange indeed. > > jmb > df already has a -m flag. Please see rev 1.23 of df.c. I already have patches for du to add the -m and -g flags. -John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006050218.WAA20146>