From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 5 8: 4:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from rtso200.ruraltel.net (rtso200.ruraltel.net [24.225.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4B537B9D2 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 08:04:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from darryl@osborne-ind.com) Received: from darryl ([24.225.30.239]) by rtso200.ruraltel.net (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-65313U13000L3000S0V35) with SMTP id net for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 10:04:24 -0500 Reply-To: From: "Darryl Hoar" To: Subject: Freebsd 4.0 & ibcs Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 10:07:35 -0500 Message-ID: <000d01bfb6a3$a5d1d560$070101c0@ruraltel.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greetings, I have an old sco 3.2.4.2 box that I'd love to replace with Freebsd. I have an application that is mission critical that runs on the SCO box, and only runs on SCO. I checked the Archives and found nothing recent on ibcs. Is this solid in 4.0 ? Do I have a chance at success or should I just keep running SCO until the hardware dies ? thanks, Darryl Hoar Computer Programmer / Systems Analyst Osborne Industries, Inc. darryl@osborne-ind.com (785) 346-2192 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message