Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 31 May 2006 11:11:05 -0700
From:      "Chris H." <fbsd@1command.com>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: imap w/cleartext on 5.4-RELEASE
Message-ID:  <20060531111105.9huk3kjwgwoswgk4@webmail.1command.com>
In-Reply-To: <4460F09C.7090706@rogers.com>
References:  <20060509152734.N54136@mail1.jasons.us> <4460F09C.7090706@rogers.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This message is in MIME format and has been PGP signed.

--=_75zs8u4jx8g0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=ISO-8859-1;
	format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello,
I realize this message is somewhat old. But as I'm also running
FreeBSD-5.4 + Horde/Imp. I thought I'd comment. I have been using
Horde+Imp with IMAP-UW for several years. I just recently installed
Dovecot. I did so while IMAP-UW was still installed. I simply
commented out the lines for IMAP-UW in inetd.conf, sent a
killall -HUP inetd and proceeded to build/ install Dovecot. This
way, I'd be able to revert if I decided Dovecot was not the best
choice for me. As it turns out; I should have installed Dovecot
a LONG time ago. In short; Mike Jakubik hit the nail squarely
on the head. Dovecot *far* exceeds IMAP-UW in performance and
configurability. My server loads were *greatly* reduced after
making the switch. I also found; although taking a little longer
to setup, is by far and away more configurable and efficient than
IMPA-UW. So to anyone else that is contemplating which IMAP
server to build/ install on their system. It's a "no brainer".
Choose Dovecot. It's sure to get even better as it matures.

--Chris out...

P.S. I am not employed by, nor do I have any affiliation with
Dovecot. Other than having made the choice to install it on my
system.


Quoting Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>:

> jason wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to get imap-uw built on 5.4-RELEASE so that it wil allow 
>> plaintext logins.  (All connections will be from localhost so I'm 
>> not concerned with SSL)  But it doesn't want to behave itself.  I've 
>> tried building it this way:
>
> This belongs more on the ports mailing list, not stable. I don't know 
> why you have this problem, but i would suggest you use dovecot or 
> courier as an imap server instead.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



-- 
Shameless self-promotion follows...
... or does it?


-----------------------------------------------------------------
FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p12 (SMP - 900x2) Tue Mar 7 19:37:23 PST 2006
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////


--=_75zs8u4jx8g0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: PGP Digital Signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBEfdw5XxK1cRs0zxkRAhq5AJ0dIHfq3yEZ4GNAe/P4zh6cUV5S+wCfao+n
FbzQjmCN25Wy/WYzcYUAgrs=
=gL9U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_75zs8u4jx8g0--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060531111105.9huk3kjwgwoswgk4>