Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:30:24 +0200 From: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: "Thomas E. Zander" <riggs@rrr.de> Subject: Re: EHCI considered harmful? Message-ID: <200410291530.25339.freebsd@redesjm.local> In-Reply-To: <200410291511.24063.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <20041029075930.GG701@marvin.riggiland.au> <20041029080817.GB728@empiric.icir.org> <200410291511.24063.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El Viernes, 29 de Octubre de 2004 15:11, Michael Nottebrock escribi=F3: > On Friday, 29. October 2004 10:08, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 09:59:30AM +0200, Thomas E. Zander wrote: > > > I'm just wondering why ehci doesn't make it into GENERIC for > > > RELENG_5. Are there unresolved show stoppers related to it? > > > > ehci(4) is not stable code and fails reproducibly with my ALi-based > > USB2 disk enclosure. > > Well, if we would take stability and general usefulness (even more so > in comparison to other USB implementations in mind) as the reference > point, we would need to disable most of USB. I think enabling ehci in > GENERIC would be a good idea, especially since there's no loadable > module... from RELENG_5_3 src/sys/modules/usb: # $FreeBSD: src/sys/modules/usb/Makefile,v 1.15 2004/07/12 21:59:06 imp=20 Exp $ [ ... ] SRCS+=3D uhci_pci.c uhci.c uhcireg.h uhcivar.h SRCS+=3D ohci_pci.c ohci.c ohcireg.h ohcivar.h SRCS+=3D ehci_pci.c ehci.c ehcireg.h ehcivar.h SRCS+=3D opt_bus.h pci_if.h =2Einclude <bsd.kmod.mk> so the usb module is ready for ehci. In fact, I use to take-off any udb support form kernel and go only with=20 modules. =2D- josemi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410291530.25339.freebsd>