From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Feb 19 22:50:48 1995 Return-Path: bugs-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id WAA00333 for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 19 Feb 1995 22:50:48 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id WAA00326; Sun, 19 Feb 1995 22:50:47 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: uhclem%nemesis@fw.ast.com (Frank Durda IV) cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Bugs in snap 021095 In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 19 Feb 95 12:07:00 CST." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 19 Feb 1995 22:50:47 -0800 Message-ID: <325.793263047@freefall.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Is this the address to report bugs in a SNAP version to? Let > me know and I will type them up. Yes it is, please do! You should not have had to install this thing 10 times, regardless of what ftp site you may have used. > Please reply at uhclem%nemesis@fw.ast.com You really should set your Reply-To address if you're going to maintain this practice - it's entirely unreasonable to expect those replying to always have to hand-edit their outgoing replies. I know that I am going to simply forget to do so 4 times out of 5 and I get far too much mail to make any special exceptions for people.. Especially when it can be done with a simple change to ones MH config or sendmail.cf. Jordan