From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 17:04:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D65DAF1; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:04:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E298FC08; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:04:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id je9so2111710bkc.13 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:04:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UfehT4xH/2/LI9wCkduaYnPYFxmt47uoAqJvFL/fa90=; b=T3RH6XwrFW8ra33JkL/sHsSn6Uhv+sjEqYvWxo2tEshSJzzP4hHjmWu5+oG8gf2Jnh AbC3qvzWWvRVB4lEiUvxsH36695nRnkBVlj7OMaZC8QcVIDc8TCXgHix+mu8lFqxoVlw pY0QHxd3HZSIUp35m+giKaHSHd++BGCSv2riEke0s2ofVF3GQtX4HSztpxDeJXMlyEOp wjhr5tJL/NgRQGAZldRvaFV9LV6tHT1QrRUKqJOR2MSkutJeFUEJVgEJ4PGIXvFyIvUZ GvEzk6rPAVQo5Na7vUt8nPYJhKKwzvaVq696+cMNe3rVgvwv0gInHJSUce+EOV0RYRlq 3ovw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.147.22 with SMTP id j22mr6512366bkv.66.1355245473310; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:04:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.167.71 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:04:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.167.71 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:04:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50C762C4.9080302@FreeBSD.org> References: <50C7576C.5040100@FreeBSD.org> <50C762C4.9080302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:04:33 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC/HEADSUP] portmaster default -w (preserve shared libraries) From: Chris Rees To: Alex Dupre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Jeremy Messenger , Kimmo Paasiala , FreeBSD Ports , Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:04:40 -0000 On 11 Dec 2012 16:44, "Alex Dupre" wrote: > > Jeremy Messenger ha scritto: > > >> Absolutely yes from me. The -w option is real lifesaver and should be > >> on by default. > > > > I disagree. The -w is a temp fix and not a correct solution, so it > > shouldn't be default. > > I agree with your disagreement :-) > I get what you're saying, but please consider which is easier to reverse- deleting an accidentally saved library, or restoring an accidentally deleted library? Defaults should be safe. I was bitten by this with pcre- sometimes we can't update all our ports at one time. How isn't it correct? We still keep src libraries around until we make delete-old-libs. Why should ports be different? Chris