Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Feb 2000 13:22:11 -0600
From:      Jim King <king@sstar.com>
To:        Jon Rust <jpr@vcnet.com>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: good network card (xl0 packet dropping)
Message-ID:  <4.2.0.58.20000224132002.00a70e98@mail.sstar.com>
In-Reply-To: <v0421011ab4db30557c5f@[209.239.239.22]>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002180057220.371-100000@localhost> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002180057220.371-100000@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:05 AM 2/24/2000 -0800, Jon Rust wrote:
>At 1:03 AM -0500 2/18/00, Will Saxon wrote:
>>What was the problem? I had a problem once doing the same thing with mine,
>>but it was user error - the other side was 100mbit full duplex and I had
>>forgotten to enable full-duplex. REALLY slow :P.
>
>This is why I won't use 10/100 Intel cards. I've had numerous problems 
>with them and my cisco cat 2924. They really don't seem to like talking to 
>another auto-negotiating device. I end up having to manually set one side 
>(or both) to get it to work. An unnecessary pain in the arse if you ask 
>me. It's been a while since I tried, so maybe it was a driver issue and 
>was fixed. For my money, the Kingston kne100tx's work fine, and the 
>lne100tx's from Linksys do as well. No superlatives, they just work.

YMMV.  In my office we had a Catalyst (5000?) that wouldn't auto-negotiate 
with TI Thunderlan NICs, but does fine with Intel and 3Com.

Jim



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.0.58.20000224132002.00a70e98>