From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 19 17:36:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D63B16A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:36:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ox.eicat.ca (ox.eicat.ca [66.96.30.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3522643D31 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:36:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgilbert@daveg.ca) Received: by ox.eicat.ca (Postfix, from userid 66) id 60BE7CAFA; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:36:46 -0500 (EST) Received: by canoe.dclg.ca (Postfix, from userid 101) id 7CF5267FD; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:36:43 -0500 (EST) From: David Gilbert MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16798.12075.465147.307112@canoe.dclg.ca> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:36:43 -0500 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta17) "chayote" (+CVS-20040321) XEmacs Lucid Subject: List of fake vs. real SATA drives. X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:36:47 -0000 Is there anyone compiling a list of "fake" vs. "real" SATA drives? The difference being "fake" drives with ATA-100 electronics and an SATA to ATA conversion chip vs. drives that really support SATA natively? Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================