From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun  8 18:30:00 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725DD16A41C
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed,  8 Jun 2005 18:30:00 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr)
Received: from pinus.cc.fer.hr (pinus.cc.fer.hr [161.53.73.18])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2AE643D1F
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed,  8 Jun 2005 18:29:59 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr)
Received: from [161.53.72.113] (lara.cc.fer.hr [161.53.72.113])
	by pinus.cc.fer.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id j58IWWpq015710;
	Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:32:32 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <42A738E4.5040506@fer.hr>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 20:28:52 +0200
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041213)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephan Uphoff <ups@tree.com>
References: <42A475AB.6020808@fer.hr>	<20050607194005.GG837@darkness.comp.waw.pl>	<20050607201642.GA58346@walton.maths.tcd.ie>	<42A6091C.40409@samsco.org>
	<1118253944.27369.35584.camel@palm>
In-Reply-To: <1118253944.27369.35584.camel@palm>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Google SoC idea
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 18:30:00 -0000

Stephan Uphoff wrote:

> In my opinion the original proposal described a non volatile write cache
> using dedicated cache disks.

Yes, I think that best describes what I have in mind. Here's the 
proposal that went to Google yesterday: 
http://geri.cc.fer.hr/~ivoras/proposal.pdf