From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Sep 26 9:56:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-153.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D13737B41E for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 09:56:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E893B66D46; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 09:56:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 09:56:40 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Gabriel Ambuehl Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD a good choice for high performance webservers? Message-ID: <20010926095640.C86198@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <60164745040.20010926174838@buz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pAwQNkOnpTn9IO2O" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <60164745040.20010926174838@buz.ch>; from gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch on Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 05:48:38PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --pAwQNkOnpTn9IO2O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 05:48:38PM +0200, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > Hello questions, > Ok, I know the subject is provoking, but it's absolutely intended > as the Makefile of the Apache 2 port states: > [... configure arguments...] > --disable-threads \ > --with-mpm=3Dpreforked # Apache's thread doesn't work > well in FreeBSD >=20 > As far as I can tell, this means FreeBSD is going to be left behind > by > Linux in the not too distant future (i.e. when Apache 2 gets > released) > cause Linux for sure will work with the threaded MPMs which are > obviously faster than the preforked approach [1] in terms of real > world HTTP performance. I for myself would really LOVE to use the > perchild module to have each VHOST running under a different UID > (needs > lots of RAM but considering what possibilities this introduces[2], > I'm > very willing to go buy that RAM especially with the current RAM > prices) > for which the FreeBSD support looks pretty bad if threaded Apache > doesn't work... Be careful what you assume is "obvious"..I seem to recall there being performance problems with that design model. Kris --pAwQNkOnpTn9IO2O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7sgjIWry0BWjoQKURAhr7AJ9V2MBhQbNmOfuUfX5vjJMWIZrAKwCgjGmo c534Aq3Xldo8vDDLBUU7s2Q= =EmEW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pAwQNkOnpTn9IO2O-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message